Special report: 2008 Olympic Games
BEIJING, July 8 -- With the city of Beijing racing against time to do all it can to present the best possible Olympic Games, the world should take advantage of the last days before August 8 and decide what it will bring to - and take home from - the once-every-four-years global sports fiesta.
The waves of China-bashing, which climaxed into disgusting anti-China farces in a handful of countries during the Olympic torch relay, were a timely reminder to the people of China that there are people uneasy about its growing presence.
But China is no longer what it was 30 years back. Nor are its people. After the initial outbursts of rage, more and more have come to believe it is simply not worth their time to worry about those dejected losers who are unable to adapt to new realities.
A huge bonus for the authorities at home, very much against the wishes of those who had wanted to sow seeds of discord within the country, is that the average citizen has seen through the real intentions of the fuss-makers and rallied more closely than ever around the Olympic undertaking.
And the consensus now is to make the Beijing Games a success. The unpleasant episodes in the past months only consolidated the resolve to make it so.
With the meticulous preparations led and coordinated by the organizing authorities, as well as the unreserved support of the central and local governments, and that of the concerned public, we have full confidence Beijing will live up to all our anticipations of a successful Olympic Games.
But such a success entails more than host hospitality.
The single obvious threat to the impending Games appears to be politicization. It is no secret that various anti-China forces have been colluding to hijack the Games for political ends.
Yet the Beijing Games belongs not to Beijing, or China. It is rather the entire world celebrating sportsmanship, peace and friendship in Beijing. We should not tolerate any plot to derail the event, because that will be blasphemy against what is held dear in the heart of the international Olympic family.
With exactly a month to go before the Games, the world must make a choice - about the future course of mankind's most celebrated event in spectator sports.
For the health of the international Olympic movement, let sports be sports.
(Source: China Daily)
Monday, July 7, 2008
Cricket-mad India focussed on Beijing Olympics
NEW DELHI (AFP) — India face the four-yearly dilemma of watching their favourite sport cricket or switching to the Olympics, and this time the Beijing extravaganza appears to be winning.
The Olympics clash with India's cricket tour of Sri Lanka with the iconic Sachin Tendulkar needing just 172 runs to overtake West Indian Brian Lara as the most prolific Test batsman.
Indians can't live without cricket but the younger generation, grown on a steady diet of live world-class sporting action on their television screens, regard the Olympics as a must-watch.
A recent poll conducted by one of the Games sponsors found that almost 70 percent of city-bred Indians will closely follow the action in Beijing even as the cricket goes on in Sri Lanka.
"We may be a one-sport nation but it will be wrong to assume the new generation only follows cricket," said veteran sports writer Vijay Lokapally.
"They understand what the Olympics is all about and won't allow just cricket to dominate their mindset. You can't fool this generation."
It does not matter that India's returns from past Olympics have been minimal.
The last time India won an Olympic gold medal was in hockey at the west-boycotted Moscow Games in 1980. This time, the eight-time champions have not even qualified for the Games.
India have just four individual medals, the last three coming in each of the previous three editions.
The country is pinning its hopes on shooters, archers, boxers and tennis veterans to deliver a medal, a prospect that excites viewers as much as Tendulkar's impending record.
"It will be great if Tendulkar goes past Lara but his record will be broken one day by someone else," said sports enthusiast Pritam Sinha. "But an Olympic medal is for keeps and carries immense value."
Sharda Ugra, sports editor of the respected India Today magazine, said an early medal will enliven Indian interest in the Games.
"If we win an early medal, there will be a lot of interest," said Ugra.
"Anyway, we have always been a nation of great sports watchers. There has been good viewership for quality sports in the country since past so many years.
"Olympics is a visual treat and fans enjoy the atmosphere."
Boxing official Muralidharan Raja said the charm of the Olympics was unrivalled.
"The Olympics is in a different league altogether, it's the ultimate challenge," he said.
"India may be crazy about cricket but the Olympics have their own fans and following. Olympics will never lose out to cricket."
Raja's views were echoed by young tennis player Venayak Gupta, 16.
"We get to watch so much cricket, it gets boring after some time," he said. "The Olympics come once in four years, why would anyone want to miss them."
Major events at the Olympics will be shown live by state-run broadcaster Dooordarshan, while a large media contingent will make the trip to Beijing despite India's absence in hockey.
Source: http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5j6GVatfFqLK0T98utXmstLWZ3OGA
The Olympics clash with India's cricket tour of Sri Lanka with the iconic Sachin Tendulkar needing just 172 runs to overtake West Indian Brian Lara as the most prolific Test batsman.
Indians can't live without cricket but the younger generation, grown on a steady diet of live world-class sporting action on their television screens, regard the Olympics as a must-watch.
A recent poll conducted by one of the Games sponsors found that almost 70 percent of city-bred Indians will closely follow the action in Beijing even as the cricket goes on in Sri Lanka.
"We may be a one-sport nation but it will be wrong to assume the new generation only follows cricket," said veteran sports writer Vijay Lokapally.
"They understand what the Olympics is all about and won't allow just cricket to dominate their mindset. You can't fool this generation."
It does not matter that India's returns from past Olympics have been minimal.
The last time India won an Olympic gold medal was in hockey at the west-boycotted Moscow Games in 1980. This time, the eight-time champions have not even qualified for the Games.
India have just four individual medals, the last three coming in each of the previous three editions.
The country is pinning its hopes on shooters, archers, boxers and tennis veterans to deliver a medal, a prospect that excites viewers as much as Tendulkar's impending record.
"It will be great if Tendulkar goes past Lara but his record will be broken one day by someone else," said sports enthusiast Pritam Sinha. "But an Olympic medal is for keeps and carries immense value."
Sharda Ugra, sports editor of the respected India Today magazine, said an early medal will enliven Indian interest in the Games.
"If we win an early medal, there will be a lot of interest," said Ugra.
"Anyway, we have always been a nation of great sports watchers. There has been good viewership for quality sports in the country since past so many years.
"Olympics is a visual treat and fans enjoy the atmosphere."
Boxing official Muralidharan Raja said the charm of the Olympics was unrivalled.
"The Olympics is in a different league altogether, it's the ultimate challenge," he said.
"India may be crazy about cricket but the Olympics have their own fans and following. Olympics will never lose out to cricket."
Raja's views were echoed by young tennis player Venayak Gupta, 16.
"We get to watch so much cricket, it gets boring after some time," he said. "The Olympics come once in four years, why would anyone want to miss them."
Major events at the Olympics will be shown live by state-run broadcaster Dooordarshan, while a large media contingent will make the trip to Beijing despite India's absence in hockey.
Source: http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5j6GVatfFqLK0T98utXmstLWZ3OGA
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
